In our data study we searched for the key phrase Stone Supplier in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Stone Supplier Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Stone Supplier Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Stone Supplier Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for all Stone Supplier companies is 42. This means that on average, Stone Supplier companies have received 42 reviews from their customers. However, it is important to note that there is a wide range of review counts among Stone Supplier companies, with some having as few as 4 reviews and others having as many as 500 reviews. This suggests that there is a significant variation in the level of engagement and reputation management practices among Stone Supplier companies. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of actively managing online reviews and reputation for Stone Supplier companies in order to stand out in a competitive market.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Stone Supplier Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on Stone Supplier companies in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for companies ranked in the top 3 of Google was highest in Houston with 236 reviews, followed by San Diego with 152 reviews. Los Angeles had an average of 41 reviews, while San Antonio, Dallas, and San Jose had 27, 24, and 23 reviews respectively. New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago had the lowest average number of reviews in the top 3 with 21, 19, and 2 reviews respectively. These findings suggest that Stone Supplier companies in Houston and San Diego have a higher level of engagement with their customers, while companies in New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago may need to focus on improving their online presence and reputation management strategies.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Stone Supplier Google Reviews
After analyzing Stone Supplier Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that North Las Vegas had the highest amount of Google reviews for Stone Suppliers with a staggering 22,524 reviews. Charlotte and Houston followed closely behind with 2,902 and 708 reviews respectively. San Diego, Jacksonville, Fontana, Thousand Oaks, Cleveland, Plano, and Albuquerque rounded out the top ten cities with the highest amount of Stone Supplier Google reviews. It’s interesting to note that the amount of reviews varied greatly between cities, with North Las Vegas having over 30 times the amount of reviews as Albuquerque. This data highlights the importance of reputation management for Stone Suppliers, as having a high amount of positive reviews can greatly impact a business’s success.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Stone Supplier Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
After conducting a thorough data study on Stone Supplier Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that Lexington, Grand Prairie, and Cape Coral had the least amount of reviews in the top 3. Despite having only one review each, these cities still managed to rank in the top 3 for Stone Suppliers. This raises questions about the impact of online reviews on business success and whether having a high number of reviews is truly necessary for success. It also highlights the potential for businesses in these cities to improve their online presence and reputation management strategies to attract more customers and increase their success. Overall, this finding emphasizes the importance of analyzing and understanding the review and reputation management landscape for businesses in all cities, regardless of their size or number of reviews.
