In our data study we searched for the key phrase Squash Court in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Squash Court Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Squash Court Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Squash Court Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for all Squash Court companies is relatively low. In fact, 100 or less reviews were the most common, with 200 or less coming in at a close second. This suggests that Squash Court companies may not be receiving as much attention or engagement from customers as other types of businesses. However, it’s important to note that there were a few outliers with significantly higher review counts, indicating that some Squash Court companies are doing a better job at managing their online reputation than others. Overall, this data highlights the need for Squash Court companies to prioritize their online presence and reputation management strategies in order to stand out in a crowded market.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Squash Court Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough research project on Squash Court Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that San Jose had the highest average number of reviews in the top 3, with a staggering 830 reviews. This was followed by Chicago with 216 reviews, and Philadelphia with 158 reviews. Surprisingly, New York, which is known for its bustling squash scene, only had an average of 28 reviews in the top 3. It is interesting to note that Los Angeles and San Antonio had 0 reviews in the top 3, indicating a potential gap in the market for Squash Court companies to improve their online presence and reputation management. Overall, the data study provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape of Squash Court companies in the United States.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Squash Court Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough analysis of Squash Court Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the cities with the highest amount of Google reviews for Squash Courts are Akron, Montgomery, Brownsville, Santa Rosa, Palmdale, San Jose, Riverside, Augusta, Mobile, and Pembroke Pines. These cities have a combined total of over 40,000 reviews, with Akron leading the pack with 8,086 reviews. It’s interesting to note that these cities are spread out across the country, with some on the East Coast, some on the West Coast, and some in the South. This suggests that Squash Courts are popular in a variety of regions and not just limited to certain areas. It’s also worth mentioning that the number of reviews for Squash Courts in these cities is quite high, indicating that there is a significant interest in this sport among Google users. Overall, this data study provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape of Squash Courts in the United States.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Squash Court Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
After conducting a thorough data study on Squash Court Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that Salinas, Pomona, and Plano had the least amount of reviews in the top 3. Despite their lack of reviews, these cities still managed to rank highly in terms of population. This raises the question of why these cities have such a low number of reviews for their Squash Courts. Is it due to a lack of interest in the sport or a lack of awareness of the courts’ existence? Further research is needed to determine the cause of this trend. Nonetheless, it is clear that these cities have room for improvement in terms of their Squash Court review and reputation management.
