In our data study we searched for the key phrase Container Terminal in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Container Terminal Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Container Terminal Companies
After conducting a thorough data study on Container Terminal Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for all Container Terminal companies was 41. This means that on average, Container Terminal companies have received 41 reviews on their Google My Business profiles. However, it is important to note that there is a wide range of review counts among these companies, with some having as few as 4 or less reviews and others having as many as 500 or less reviews. This variance in review counts highlights the importance of reputation management for Container Terminal companies, as having a strong online presence can greatly impact their success in the industry.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Container Terminal Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on Container Terminal Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that San Diego had the highest average number of reviews in the top 3, with a staggering 314 reviews. Following closely behind was San Jose with 274 reviews, and then Los Angeles with 132 reviews. Surprisingly, New York only had an average of 91 reviews in the top 3, despite being one of the largest cities in the country. The numbers then dropped significantly, with Dallas having an average of 29 reviews, Philadelphia with 22, and Houston with 20. Chicago, Phoenix, and San Antonio had even lower averages, with 10, 7, and 0 reviews respectively. These findings suggest that there may be a significant disparity in the review and reputation management landscape for Container Terminal companies across different cities in the United States.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Container Terminal Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough data study on Container Terminal Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that Anchorage, Alaska had the highest amount of Google reviews with a staggering 31,018. Following closely behind were Tulsa, Oklahoma with 28,985 reviews and Salt Lake City, Utah with 16,127 reviews. Nashville, Tennessee, Austin, Texas, Sacramento, California, Irvine, California, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Syracuse, New York, and Huntsville, Alabama rounded out the top ten cities with the highest amount of Container Terminal Google reviews. It is interesting to note that these cities are spread out across the country and are not concentrated in any one region. This data provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape of Container Terminals in the United States and can be used to inform future business strategies.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Container Terminal Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
Our data study on Container Terminal Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States has revealed some interesting findings. Among them, we discovered that some cities with the least amount of reviews still managed to rank in the top 3. Escondido, El Paso, and Durham were the top 3 cities with the least amount of Container Terminal Google reviews, yet they still managed to rank highly in terms of population. This raises questions about the correlation between population and review activity, and whether or not businesses in these cities are actively managing their online reputation. It also highlights the potential for businesses in these cities to improve their online presence and attract more customers through effective review and reputation management strategies.