In our data study we searched for the key phrase Betting Agency in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Betting Agency Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Betting Agency Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Betting Agency Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for all Betting Agency companies is 62. This means that on average, Betting Agency companies have a decent amount of reviews, which can be a good indicator of their reputation and customer satisfaction. However, it is important to note that there is a wide range of review counts among these companies, with some having as few as 4 reviews and others having as many as 500. This suggests that there is a significant variation in the level of engagement and reputation management practices among Betting Agency companies. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of actively managing online reviews and reputation for Betting Agency companies in order to stand out in a competitive market.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Betting Agency Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on the Betting Agency industry in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for companies ranked in the top 3 of Google varied greatly across different cities. Philadelphia had the highest average number of reviews with 49, followed by Chicago with 25, and Phoenix with 23. However, the average number of reviews for companies in the top 3 of Google in Los Angeles, New York, Houston, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, and San Jose were all 20 or less. It is interesting to note that New York, one of the largest and most populous cities in the United States, had the lowest average number of reviews with only 6. This data suggests that there may be a disparity in the level of review and reputation management among Betting Agency companies in different cities.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Betting Agency Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough analysis of Betting Agency Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that Albuquerque, Kansas City, and Columbus had the highest amount of Google reviews. These cities had an impressive 58,787, 13,689, and 13,000 reviews respectively. It’s interesting to note that Kansas City appeared twice in the top 10, indicating a strong presence of betting agencies in that city. Other cities that made the list include Baltimore, St. Louis, Dayton, Hialeah, and Grand Prairie. It’s clear that there is a significant demand for betting agencies in these cities, and businesses in this industry should focus on maintaining a positive reputation to attract and retain customers. Overall, this data study provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape of the betting agency industry in the United States.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Betting Agency Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
After conducting a thorough data study on the Betting Agency landscape in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that some cities with the least amount of Google reviews still managed to rank in the top 3. Clarksville, Chula Vista, Chattanooga, Charlotte, Brownsville, Boise, Austin, Augusta, Anaheim, and Akron were the cities that had zero reviews for their Betting Agencies. Despite this, they managed to secure a spot in the top 3. This finding is quite perplexing as one would expect that cities with more reviews would have a better reputation management landscape. It is possible that these cities have a smaller number of Betting Agencies, which could explain the lack of reviews. However, further research is needed to understand the reasons behind this phenomenon.
