Excellent
Group

5.0 (1542 reviews)

ATM Reputation Management

In our data study we searched for the key phrase ATM in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed ATM Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.

Average Number Of Reviews For All ATM Companies

After conducting a thorough analysis of ATM Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for all ATM companies is relatively low. In fact, 50% of all ATM companies have four or fewer reviews, while 75% have 20 or fewer reviews. This suggests that ATM companies are not actively seeking out reviews or managing their online reputation effectively. With the increasing importance of online reviews in consumer decision-making, it is crucial for ATM companies to prioritize their online presence and reputation management strategies. By doing so, they can improve their visibility, attract more customers, and ultimately increase their revenue.

Average Number Of Reviews Of The ATM Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google

Our data study on ATM Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States has revealed some interesting findings. One of the key metrics we analyzed was the average number of reviews for ATM companies ranked in the top 3 of Google search results. Surprisingly, our study found that for all 200 cities, the average number of reviews for these top-ranked ATM companies was zero. This is a perplexing finding, as one would expect that the top-ranked companies would have a higher number of reviews, indicating a better reputation and customer satisfaction. Further research is needed to understand why this is the case and what factors may be contributing to this trend.

Cities With The Highest Amount Of ATM Google Reviews

After conducting a thorough analysis of ATM Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the cities with the highest amount of ATM Google reviews are Akron, Albuquerque, Alexandria, Amarillo, Anaheim, Anchorage, Arlington, Atlanta, Augusta, and Aurora. Interestingly, all of these cities had a value of 0 for columns 6-10, indicating that they did not have any negative reviews or reputation management issues on their ATM Google profiles. It is worth noting that while these cities had the highest amount of reviews, they were not necessarily the cities with the most ATMs. This suggests that customers in these cities are more likely to leave reviews for ATMs, which could be due to a variety of factors such as convenience, accessibility, or customer service. Overall, this data provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape for ATMs in the United States.

Cities With The Least Amount Of ATM Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3

Our data study on ATM Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States revealed some interesting findings. Among them, we discovered that some cities with the least amount of ATM Google reviews still managed to rank in the top 3. Aurora, Augusta, and Atlanta were among the cities that had zero reviews for their ATMs, yet they still managed to make it to the top 3. This raises questions about the importance of online reviews and reputation management for ATM businesses. Are customers not leaving reviews for ATMs, or are ATM businesses not actively managing their online reputation? Further research is needed to understand the reasons behind these findings.

Enter Your Email To Request A Personalized Demo

Group ()
Trusted By 1500+ People

By submitting your contact info, you authorize Reviewgrower to message you to schedule a demo and setup your account via email and/or sms as well as send promotional offers.

Your Complete Solution for Building an Online Presence.

image ()
image ()
image ()
image ()
image ()
image ()