In our data study we searched for the key phrase Apartment Building in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Apartment Building Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Apartment Building Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Apartment Building Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for all apartment building companies was 26. This means that on average, apartment building companies have received 26 reviews from their customers. However, it is important to note that there is a wide range of review counts among these companies, with some having as few as 2 reviews and others having as many as 500. Additionally, it was found that the majority of apartment building companies (over 50%) had 50 or fewer reviews. This suggests that there is a significant opportunity for these companies to improve their online reputation and attract more customers by actively managing their reviews and ratings.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Apartment Building Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on Apartment Building Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found some interesting results. The average number of reviews for the top 3 companies in each city varied greatly, with San Jose taking the lead with an average of 194 reviews. Houston followed closely behind with an average of 154 reviews, while Philadelphia had an average of 112 reviews. Surprisingly, New York City, known for its bustling real estate market, only had an average of 66 reviews for the top 3 companies. Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, San Diego, San Antonio, and Phoenix all had averages ranging from 54 to 10 reviews. These findings suggest that there is a significant disparity in the review and reputation management landscape for Apartment Building companies across different cities in the United States.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Apartment Building Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough analysis of Apartment Building Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that Washington, Pembroke Pines, and Naperville had the highest amount of Google reviews for apartment buildings. Surprisingly, cities like McKinney and San Jose also made it to the top five, beating out more well-known cities like New York and Los Angeles. It’s interesting to note that cities in the South, such as Nashville and Frisco, also had a significant number of reviews. Fort Worth and Houston rounded out the top ten, with each city having over 450 reviews. Overall, it’s clear that people are actively reviewing apartment buildings across the country, and property managers should take note of the importance of reputation management on Google My Business.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Apartment Building Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
Our data study on Apartment Building Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States revealed some interesting findings. Among them, we discovered that some cities with the least amount of reviews still managed to rank in the top 3. Baton Rouge, Bakersfield, and Aurora were the top 3 cities with the least amount of reviews, all with a count of 0. Despite this, they still managed to rank highly in terms of population. This raises questions about the importance of online reviews in the decision-making process for potential renters. Are people relying less on online reviews and more on other factors such as location and price? Or are these cities simply lacking in online presence and reputation management? Further research is needed to fully understand the impact of online reviews on the apartment building industry.
