In our data study we searched for the key phrase Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for all companies in this category is 47. This means that on average, Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer companies have received 47 reviews on their Google My Business profiles. However, it is important to note that there is a wide range of review counts among these companies, with some having only one review and others having as many as 500. This indicates that there is a significant variation in the level of engagement and reputation management among Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer companies. Overall, this data suggests that companies in this category should prioritize their online reputation management efforts to ensure they are effectively engaging with customers and maintaining a positive online presence.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer companies in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for companies ranked in the top 3 of Google was 67 in San Antonio, 39 in Dallas, 27 in Philadelphia, 18 in Houston, 7 in San Jose, and 1 in San Diego. Surprisingly, we found that there were no reviews for companies ranked in the top 3 of Google in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, or Phoenix. This raises questions about the reputation management strategies of these companies and the effectiveness of their online presence. It is clear that there is a significant disparity in the number of reviews for Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer companies across different cities, and further research is needed to understand the reasons behind this trend.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough data study on Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that Hollywood, Bridgeport, and Killeen had the highest amount of Google reviews. Hollywood topped the list with a whopping 5849 reviews, followed by Bridgeport with 1151 and Killeen with 784. Other cities that made the top ten list include Tulsa, Indianapolis, Little Rock, Chattanooga, Alexandria, Fort Collins, and Louisville. It’s interesting to note that these cities are spread out across the country and not concentrated in one particular region. This suggests that there is a demand for agricultural machinery manufacturers in various parts of the United States. The high number of Google reviews also indicates that customers are actively engaging with these businesses and sharing their experiences with others. Overall, this data study provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape of Agricultural Machinery Manufacturers in the United States.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
After conducting a thorough data study on Agricultural Machinery Manufacturer Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that some cities had surprisingly low numbers of reviews despite ranking in the top 3. The cities with the least amount of reviews were Overland Park, Ontario, and New York, with all three cities having a total of zero reviews. Montgomery and Milwaukee followed closely behind with only one review each. It is perplexing to see such low numbers of reviews for these cities, especially considering their high population and potential for agricultural machinery manufacturing. It raises questions about the reputation management strategies of these businesses and the effectiveness of their online presence.
