In our data study we searched for the key phrase Outdoor Equestrian Facility in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Outdoor Equestrian Facility Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Outdoor Equestrian Facility Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Outdoor Equestrian Facility Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for all companies in this category is 22. This means that most Outdoor Equestrian Facility companies have received at least 22 reviews on their Google My Business profile. However, it is interesting to note that there are still a significant number of companies that have received 20 or less reviews, with some even having zero reviews. This suggests that there is still a lot of room for growth and improvement in terms of review and reputation management for Outdoor Equestrian Facility companies across the country. It is important for these companies to actively engage with their customers and encourage them to leave reviews in order to improve their online presence and attract more business.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Outdoor Equestrian Facility Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on Outdoor Equestrian Facility Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found some interesting results. The average number of reviews for companies ranked in the top 3 of Google varied greatly across different cities. Los Angeles had the highest average number of reviews with 198, while Houston had the lowest with only 6. It’s surprising to see such a large discrepancy between cities, especially considering the importance of online reviews in today’s digital age. Companies in cities with lower average review numbers may want to focus on improving their online reputation management strategies to attract more customers. On the other hand, companies in cities with higher average review numbers may want to continue their efforts to maintain their positive reputation and stand out among their competitors. Overall, this data study highlights the importance of online reviews and reputation management for Outdoor Equestrian Facility companies in the United States.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Outdoor Equestrian Facility Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough data study on Outdoor Equestrian Facilities in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that Jacksonville, Los Angeles, and Tucson had the highest amount of Google reviews for these types of facilities. Surprisingly, Palmdale and New York also made the top five, with Waco, Eugene, Gilbert, West Valley City, and Washington rounding out the list. It’s interesting to note that these cities are spread out across the country and not just concentrated in one region. This suggests that there is a demand for outdoor equestrian facilities in various parts of the United States. It’s also worth mentioning that the number of Google reviews for these facilities varied greatly, with Jacksonville having a whopping 796 reviews and Washington only having 195. This indicates that some cities may have a more active equestrian community or a higher concentration of outdoor equestrian facilities. Overall, this data study provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape for Outdoor Equestrian Facilities in the United States.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Outdoor Equestrian Facility Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
After conducting a thorough data study on Outdoor Equestrian Facilities in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that Aurora, Augusta, and Atlanta had the least amount of Google reviews for these types of facilities, yet still ranked in the top 3. This finding is quite perplexing as one would assume that a lack of reviews would result in a lower ranking. However, it is possible that these cities have a smaller number of Outdoor Equestrian Facilities overall, leading to less competition and a higher ranking despite the lack of reviews. It is also possible that these facilities have a strong reputation within their local community, leading to word-of-mouth recommendations rather than online reviews. Further research is needed to fully understand this phenomenon.
