In our data study we searched for the key phrase Gardener in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Gardener Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Gardener Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Gardener Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for all Gardener companies was 35. This means that on average, Gardener companies have received 35 reviews from their customers. However, it is important to note that there is a wide range of review counts among Gardener companies, with some having as few as 4 reviews and others having as many as 500. This suggests that there is a significant variation in the level of review and reputation management among Gardener companies. Further research is needed to understand the factors that contribute to this variation and to identify best practices for managing online reviews and reputation for Gardener companies.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Gardener Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough research project analyzing Gardener Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for the top 3 ranked Gardener companies on Google was 315 in New York City. This number was significantly higher than the second-ranked city, Philadelphia, which had an average of 147 reviews. The third-ranked city, Chicago, had an average of 85 reviews, while the remaining cities had significantly lower averages ranging from 25 to 1. This data suggests that Gardener companies in New York City have a higher level of engagement and reputation management on Google compared to other cities in the United States. It also highlights the importance of having a strong online presence and actively managing reviews for Gardener companies to stand out in a competitive market.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Gardener Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough research project analyzing Gardener Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that St. Petersburg, Milwaukee, and Sioux Falls had the highest amount of Google reviews for gardeners. Surprisingly, New York, a city known for its bustling urban landscape, only ranked eighth on the list. It’s interesting to note that smaller cities like Port St. Lucie and Tallahassee also made it to the top five. This data suggests that people in smaller cities may be more likely to leave reviews for their local gardeners, while those in larger cities may not prioritize reviewing their services. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape for gardeners across the United States.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Gardener Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
After conducting a thorough data study on Gardener Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that some cities had surprisingly low numbers of reviews despite ranking in the top 3. Akron, Orlando, and Jackson were the cities with the least amount of Gardener Google reviews, with only 2, 1, and 1 reviews respectively. It is perplexing to see such low numbers of reviews for these cities, especially considering their high population and ranking. It raises questions about the reputation management strategies of Gardener businesses in these cities and whether they are utilizing Google My Business to its full potential. Despite the low number of reviews, these cities still managed to rank in the top 3, indicating that there may be other factors at play in their success. Further research is needed to fully understand the reputation management landscape for Gardener businesses in these cities.
