In our data study we searched for the key phrase Science Museum in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Science Museum Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Science Museum Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Science Museum Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for all Science Museum companies is 87. This means that Science Museums across the country are receiving a decent amount of feedback from their visitors. However, it’s important to note that there is a wide range of review counts, with some Science Museums having only a handful of reviews while others have hundreds or even thousands. This suggests that there may be some Science Museums that are not actively managing their online reputation, while others are doing an excellent job of engaging with their visitors and encouraging them to leave feedback. Overall, the average number of reviews for Science Museums is a good starting point for understanding the review and reputation management landscape, but it’s important to dig deeper into individual profiles to get a more complete picture.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Science Museum Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on Science Museum Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for the top 3 ranked companies varied greatly. San Jose had the highest average number of reviews with 23,350, followed closely by San Antonio with 23,067. On the other hand, Philadelphia had the lowest average number of reviews with only 25, and Chicago had an average of 0 reviews. It is interesting to note that New York, a city known for its abundance of museums, had an average of 7,526 reviews, which is significantly lower than the top two cities. This data suggests that there may be a disparity in the popularity and reputation of science museums across different cities in the United States. Further research could be conducted to explore the reasons behind these variations and how they may impact the success of science museums in different regions.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Science Museum Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough data study on Science Museum Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we have found that Las Vegas, Hialeah, and Sunnyvale have the highest amount of Google reviews for their respective Science Museums. Las Vegas takes the lead with a whopping 141,000 reviews, followed closely by Hialeah with 129,000 and Sunnyvale with 91,068. Other cities that made the top 10 list include Ontario, North Las Vegas, San Jose, San Antonio, Charlotte, Mesa, and Omaha. It is interesting to note that these cities are spread out across the country and are not concentrated in any particular region. This suggests that Science Museums are popular attractions for people all over the United States. The high number of reviews also indicates that Science Museums are actively engaging with their visitors and encouraging them to leave feedback. Overall, this data study provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape of Science Museums in the United States.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Science Museum Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
After conducting a thorough data study on Science Museum Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found some interesting results. Surprisingly, some cities that ranked in the top 3 had the least amount of reviews for their Science Museums. Killeen, Sioux Falls, and Rancho Cucamonga were the top 3 cities with the least amount of reviews, with only 25, 23, and 18 reviews respectively. It’s perplexing to see that these cities, despite being in the top 3, have such a low number of reviews for their Science Museums. It raises questions about the reputation management strategies of these museums and the level of engagement with their visitors. Further research is needed to understand the reasons behind this trend and to identify potential solutions to improve the reputation and visibility of these Science Museums.
