In our data study we searched for the key phrase Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for all companies in this category is 32. This means that most Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier companies have received around 32 reviews on their Google My Business profiles. However, we also found that there are some companies that have received very few reviews, with 4 or less being the lowest number. On the other hand, there are also a few companies that have received a large number of reviews, with 500 or less being the highest number. Overall, the data suggests that Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier companies have a moderate level of review activity on their Google My Business profiles.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier companies in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for companies ranked in the top 3 of Google was 11,012 in Chicago, 1,518 in San Jose, 282 in San Antonio, 35 in Phoenix, 25 in Dallas, 7 in San Diego, 6 in New York, 5 in Philadelphia, 1 in Houston, and 0 in Los Angeles. These numbers are staggering and highlight the importance of having a strong online presence and reputation management strategy. It is clear that customers are actively seeking out and leaving reviews for Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier companies, and those with a higher number of positive reviews are more likely to attract new customers and retain existing ones. As a data scientist, it is fascinating to see the impact of online reviews on businesses and how they can make or break a company’s success.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough data study on Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we have found that St. Louis, Chicago, and Omaha have the highest amount of Google reviews. Greensboro, Buffalo, and Reno also made it to the top of the list, with over 10,000 reviews each. Surprisingly, Rancho Cucamonga, San Jose, West Valley City, and Killeen also made it to the top 10, with over 3,500 reviews each. It’s interesting to note that these cities are spread out across the country, indicating that metal detecting is a popular hobby nationwide. The high amount of reviews also suggests that there is a strong demand for metal detecting equipment suppliers in these cities. Overall, this data study provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape of Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Google My Business profiles in the United States.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
Our data study on Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier Google My Business profiles across the top 200 most populated cities in the United States has revealed some interesting findings. Among them, we discovered that some cities with the least amount of reviews still managed to rank in the top 3. For instance, Boston, Birmingham, Baltimore, Austin, Aurora, Augusta, Atlanta, Amarillo, Albuquerque, and Akron all had zero reviews, yet they still made it to the top 3. This raises questions about the factors that influence a Metal Detecting Equipment Supplier’s ranking on Google My Business. Is it solely based on the number of reviews, or are there other factors at play? Further research is needed to shed more light on this matter.
