In our data study we searched for the key phrase Laboratory Equipment Supplier in New York City, and then repeated this for the other top 199 most populated cities in the United States. We then analyzed Laboratory Equipment Supplier Google Business (previously: Google My Business) Profiles to understand the Industry. How many reviews do you need? How many reviews do you need to rank in the top 3 of Google? And much more.
Average Number Of Reviews For All Laboratory Equipment Supplier Companies
After conducting a thorough analysis of Laboratory Equipment Supplier Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that the average number of reviews for all companies in this category was 69. This means that on average, Laboratory Equipment Supplier companies have received 69 reviews on their Google My Business profiles. However, it is important to note that there is a wide range of review counts among these companies, with some having as few as 4 reviews and others having as many as 500. This suggests that there is a significant variation in the level of engagement and reputation management among Laboratory Equipment Supplier companies. Further research may be needed to understand the factors that contribute to this variation and to identify best practices for managing online reviews in this industry.
Average Number Of Reviews Of The Laboratory Equipment Supplier Companies Ranked In The Top 3 Of Google
After conducting a thorough data study on Laboratory Equipment Supplier companies in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we found that the average number of reviews for companies ranked in the top 3 of Google was 17 in New York, 15 in San Antonio, 11 in Houston, 7 in Phoenix, 4 in San Diego and San Jose, 2 in Dallas, and only 1 in Philadelphia. Surprisingly, Los Angeles and Chicago had no companies ranked in the top 3 of Google for this search term. These findings suggest that there is a significant variation in the review and reputation management landscape for Laboratory Equipment Supplier companies across different cities in the United States. It also highlights the importance of having a strong online presence and reputation management strategy for companies in this industry, especially in highly competitive cities like New York and San Antonio.
Cities With The Highest Amount Of Laboratory Equipment Supplier Google Reviews
After conducting a thorough data study on Laboratory Equipment Supplier Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, we have found that Garland, Moreno Valley, and Visalia have the highest amount of Google reviews for Laboratory Equipment Suppliers. With 6577, 2306, and 1057 reviews respectively, these cities have a significant lead over the other cities in the study. Fullerton, Topeka, and Savannah also have a notable amount of reviews, with 755, 340, and 264 respectively. It is interesting to note that Sunnyvale, Shreveport, Cape Coral, and Warren have a relatively low amount of reviews compared to the top cities, with only 219, 99, 87, and 74 reviews respectively. This data provides valuable insights into the review and reputation management landscape for Laboratory Equipment Suppliers in the United States.
Cities With The Least Amount Of Laboratory Equipment Supplier Google Reviews That Still Ranked In The Top 3
After conducting a thorough data study on Laboratory Equipment Supplier Google My Business profiles in the top 200 most populated cities in the United States, it was found that some cities with the least amount of reviews still managed to rank in the top 3. Birmingham, Baton Rouge, Baltimore, Atlanta, Arlington, Anaheim, Amarillo, Alexandria, Albuquerque, and Akron all had zero reviews, yet still managed to rank in the top 3. This finding is quite perplexing as one would assume that a lack of reviews would negatively impact a business’s reputation and ranking. It raises questions about the factors that Google considers when ranking businesses and how much weight is given to reviews. Further research is needed to fully understand this phenomenon.
